Business Sustainability Business Inter-Relationships

Question: Describe about the Business Sustainability for Business Inter-Relationships. Answer: Introduction Systems thinking are a trans-disciplinary structure for considering interrelationships rather than things. A system thinker mainly edges a problem in terms of an outline of behavior over time rather than focusing on particular events. Systems thinking approach, like other approaches, also has some criticisms. It is mainly assumed that Systems thinking is too fundamentalist. In other words, it characterizes a fundamentally technocratic outlook of business problems. The significance of this approach is that it offers people a way to approach complex and unrelenting problems more efficiently. The wicked problem that will help to define system thinking is homelessnessin Australia. It is the situation of people without a lastingdwelling, like ahouseorapartment. People who are homeless are most often not capable to obtain and uphold usual, safe, protected and satisfactoryhousing. The officially authorized definition ofhomeless diverges from country to country, or amongst diverse jurisdicti ons in the same country or region.The term homelessmay also comprise people whose most important nighttime residence is in ahomeless. The following wicked problem Homelessness in Australia illustrates the fact that Systems thinking is critical in developing solutions to sustainability challenges.Wicked problems are mainly described as a problem that is difficult or impracticable to solve because of incomplete as well as conflicting requirements. This is because stakeholders have fundamentally different worldviews as well as diverse frame to understand the issue (Haines 2016). The people, who sleep rough on the streets or under makeshift dwellings, mainly experience the problem related to Homelessness in Australia. Young children, women and families staying in refugees or crisis accommodation are considered homeless. The Australians who couch surf or stay with their friends for a limited period or stay at cheap hotels are considered homeless. Australians of all ages are likely to become homeless. However, some people are more vulnerable to homelessness as compared to others. Out of the total population, 56 percent of homeless people are male. However, the numbers of females experiencing homeless are rising significantly. Young children and people are facing homelessness excessively (Atun 2012). Refugees and shelter seekers are directly impacted by homelessness in Australia that is mainly due to poverty and social isolation. The right to work also gets restricted depending on the type of visa that the refugees hold. Homelessness also directly affects them, as most of the refugees are unable to understand the services that are allotted to them. A large proportion of people who are suffering from mental illness also face the problem related to homelessness. These people face difficulty in accessing employment as well as education and support services (Chamberlain, Johnson and Robinson 2014). According to a survey, it has been found that the primary reason that accounted for homelessness in Australia is unprepared shelter that accounted for 6 percent of homelessness in Australia. It has been found that 17 percent of the individuals are staying with their friends or relatives. In the year 2012, more than 230,000 people established assistance from specialist homelessness services. More than 25 percent of the people in Australia are facing this problem due to domestic violence. Children under the age of 12 accounts for 17 percent of homelessness in Australia. The people in Australia experience chronic homelessness that indicates significant problems (Parsell, Jones and Head 2013) The individuals who are mostly affected by homelessness are indigenous people. They face greater social and financial drawback than other sectors of the population. Low levels of education and high levels of unemployment leads to homelessness among indigenous people. Youth from alternative family types are most at risk of becoming homeless as compared to students from conservative nuclear families. Primary homelessness refers to the individual who lives without conformist accommodation. On the other hand, secondary homelessness comprises the individuals who move frequently from one impermanent shelter to a different. Secondary homelessness mainly refers to the person who stays in transitional accommodation that is provided under the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program. Tertiary homelessness in Australia refers to those who stay in boarding houses on a medium or long-term basis (Sharam and Hulse 2014). (Figure: Iceberg Model) (Source: Created by Author) The diagram shows the iceberg model that defines homeless in Australia as chronic. This is mainly because most of the people in Australia face homelessness due to lack of appropriate, stable and safe accommodation. This increases the challenge for solving homelessness. Chronic homelessness has been described as a period of homelessness for 6 months or more. The presence of abuse disorder or disability also leads to homelessness in Australia. The official figure shows that homelessness in Australia had reached the tip of iceberg. The local authorities in Australia are housing homeless families in bed and breakfast because of a chronic scarcity of appropriate private provisional accommodation. The problems are likely to get worsened in the coming years (Galamba 2013). The underlying structure of homelessness mainly includes poverty, lack of education, domestic violence, chronic gambling and poor relationship. However, Systems thinking is critical in developing solutions to sustainability challengesis not agreed largely. Systems thinking will build a relationship between problems and their causes but the relationship is not obvious. The ways it will fix the homelessness problem have inadvertent results. However, it creates a new language that helps to communicate about difficulties as well as interdependencies (Milbourne and Cloke 2013). The Australian government operates under State regulation of the NAHA states that local governments are responsible for. The local government is responsible for building approval procedure. The local government in Australia is responsible for creating a supportive environment for the individuals who are homeless or at a risk of homelessness. This is mainly executed by offering affordable housing prices as well as support for services (Australia 2012). The federal government on the other hand, should look to fund networks of local government. There is always a need to provide education as well as training to the workers and elected officials. The federal government has the scope to expand a library of best practice with respect to the local government. The local government on the other hand has the full capacity to become more concerned about addressing homelessness in Australia. The policy involves the fact that the federal government fund 15-30 pilot projects where local government where local government in Australia are unable to secure the funding. As a result, they are also not able to display a good practice. The systems that mainly get affected by homelessness in Australia are human rights. The individuals who are facing homelessness face abuses of a broad range of human rights. One of the most basic human rights is the access to safe and secure housing. The lack of connectedness with family, friends and the society also leads to homelessness. Systems thinking will mainly go beyond mechanistic processes that will acknowledge the underlying role of human drivers of intricacy and change. The system thinking process has helped a number of people to get supportive housing. This in turn, led to greater consistency across the regions in Australia. Under system thinking, the solution will take place if the initiative is taken in the form of managing housing to ending housing (Loosemore and Cheung 2015). It is very important to develop a systems thinking approach to put an end to homelessness. The government officials in Australia along with the business leaders have forged this agreement. The approach signaled a definitive shift in how the society outlook the role of temporary shelters as well as other emergency reaction services. Systems thinking won state funding and as a result, the service providers who worked independently before, struggled for foundation. System thinking helps to build a strong foundation that will lead to methodical change. This in turn, involves the engagement of varied stakeholders in the planning stage. Systems thinking maps integrate diverse viewpoints into a picture of the system and provide an understanding of the root causes of homelessness. They mainly distinguish the interrelationships among systems that include the food systems and the quality of food. They also established about the movements of the individuals and the way they determines the effort of each other. These helped to pave the way for working together and creating strategies that will eradicate homelessness. Systems thinking also facilitated societies to work jointly and support responsibility for unintentional Consequences. There many people who increase their problem every time they try to solve it. Systems thinking mainly push for a policy that allows opening a space that is used to solve homelessness problem. An individual always tries to do what he feels is correct for him but that sometimes work against him. For instance, a person might feel like waiting for the best job opportunity by rejecting the existing offers. As a result, if he does not get the god opportunity it will leave him unemployed and as a result, homeless. Systems thinking will help the people understand how they contribute to the problem and whether they have power to solve the problems (Hubert and Ison 2016). Systems thinking also commit to a compelling vision by developing strategies. This is mainly done by committing to a convincing vision and by developing and coherent a theory of change. It mainly involves being engaged in a high-quality conversation that will lead to positive consequences. The conversation will mainly involve the eradication of homelessness in Australia. This conversation is bound to bring a positive and immediate result. Applying systems thinking to homelessness in Australia affirms the consequence of integrating approaches for thinking and acting in a systematic manner. This will make a shelter director to close his facility while another person will reinvest in the organization by focusing on how to help the homeless build shelter (Arnold and Wade 2015). Conclusion It can be concluded that Primary homelessness refers to the individual who lives without conformist accommodation. On the other hand, secondary homelessness includes the individuals who move frequently from one impermanent shelter to another. It has also been concluded that the underlying structure of homelessness mainly includes poverty, lack of education, domestic violence, chronic gambling and poor relationship. The local authorities in Australia are housing homeless families in bed and breakfast because of a chronic scarcity of appropriate private provisional accommodation. With the help of this report, it has been found that 17 percent of the individuals are staying with their friends or relatives. Under system thinking, the solution will take place if the initiative is taken in the form of managing housing to ending housing. It has also been found that the presence of abuse disorder or disability also leads to homelessness in Australia. The Australians who couch surf or stay with their associates for a limited period or stay at cheap hotels are considered homeless. Australians of all ages are likely to become homeless. It has been found that Systems thinking mainly push for a policy that allows opening a space that is used to solve homelessness problem. References Arnold, R.D. and Wade, J.P., 2015. A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach.Procedia computer science,44, pp.669-678. Atun, R., 2012. Health systems, systems thinking and innovation.Health policy and planning,27(suppl 4), pp.iv4-iv8. Australia, H., 2012. Homelessness in Australia.Homelessness Australia. Web,29, pp.202011-12. Chamberlain, C., Johnson, G. and Robinson, C. eds., 2014.Homelessness in Australia. UNSW Press. Galamba, N., 2013. Waters structure around hydrophobic solutes and the iceberg model.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B,117(7), pp.2153-2159. Haines, S., 2016.The systems thinking approach to strategic planning and management. CRC Press Hubert, B. and Ison, R.L., 2016. Systems Thinking toward institutional innovation and change. Loosemore, M. and Cheung, E., 2015. Implementing systems thinking to manage risk in public private partnership projects.International Journal of Project Management,33(6), pp.1325-1334. Milbourne, P. and Cloke, P.J., 2013.International perspectives on rural homelessness. Routledge. Parsell, C., Jones, A. and Head, B., 2013. Policies and programmes to end homelessness in Australia: Learning from international practice.International Journal of Social Welfare,22(2), pp.186-194. Sharam, A. and Hulse, K., 2014. Understanding the nexus between poverty and homelessness: relational poverty analysis of families experiencing homelessness in Australia.Housing, Theory and Society,31(3), pp.294-309.